Cost analysis of substitutive renal therapies in children / Análise de custos de terapias renais substitutivas em crianças

Abstract Objective: End-stage renal disease is a health problem that consumes public and private resources. This study aimed to identify the cost of hemodialysis (either daily or conventional hemodialysis) and transplantation in children and adolescents. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort of pediatric patients with End-stage renal disease who underwent hemodialysis followed by kidney transplant. All costs incurred in the treatment were collected and the monthly total cost was calculated per patient and for each renal therapy. Subsequently, a dynamic panel data model was estimated. Results: The study included 30 children who underwent hemodialysis (16 conventional/14 daily hemodialysis) followed by renal transplantation. The mean monthly outlay for hemodialysis was USD 3500 and USD 1900 for transplant. Hemodialysis costs added up to over USD 87,000 in 40 months for conventional dialysis patients and USD 131,000 in 50 months for daily dialysis patients. In turn, transplant costs in 50 months reached USD 48,000 and USD 70,000, for conventional and daily dialysis patients, respectively. For conventional dialysis patients, transplant is less costly when therapy exceeds 16 months, whereas for daily dialysis patients, the threshold is around 13 months. Conclusion: Transplantation is less expensive than dialysis in children, and the estimated thresholds indicate that renal transplant should be the preferred treatment for pediatric patients.

Resumo Objetivo: A Doença Renal em Estágio Final é um problema de saúde que consome recursos públicos e privados. Nosso objetivo é identificar o custo da hemodiálise (hemodiálise diarias ou convencional) e transplante em crianças e adolescentes. Métodos: Uma coorte retrospectiva de pacientes pediátricos com Doença Renal em Estágio Final (DREF) submetidos à hemodiálise após transplante de rim. Todos os custos incorridos no tratamento foram cobrados e o custo total mensal foi calculado por paciente e por cada terapia renal. Então, foi estimado um modelo dinâmico com dados em painel. Resultados: Estudamos 30 crianças submetidas à hemodiálise (16 hemodiálises convencionais/14 hemodiálises diárias) após transplante renal. O gasto médio mensal para hemodiálise foi US$3,5 mil e US$1,9 mil para transplante. Os custos de hemodiálise somam mais de US$87 mil em 40 meses para pacientes submetidos a hemodiálise convencional (HC) e US$131 mil em 50 meses para pacientes submetidos a hemodiálise diária (HD). Por outro lado, os custos de transplante em 50 meses atingem US$48 e US$70 mil, para pacientes submetidos a HC e HD, respectivamente. Para pacientes submetidos à hemodiálise convencional, o transplante é menos oneroso quando a terapia ultrapassa 16 meses, ao passo que para pacientes submetidos a hemodiálise diária o limiar é cerca de 13 meses. Conclusão: O transplante é menos caro que a diálise em crianças e os limiares estimados indicam que o transplante renal deve ser o tratamento preferencial para pacientes pediátricos.

Analysis of economic impact between the modality of renal replacement therapy / Análise do impacto econômico entre as modalidades de terapia renal substitutiva

Abstract Introduction: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a major health problem, determining the reduction in life expectancy and an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Method: An observational, cohort, retrospective, based on patient's medical records data with CKD under hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis and kidney transplantation in the city of Curitiba, in the period from January to June 2014, evacuativo the financial impact on the Unified Health System (SUS) and the supplementary health. Results: The lowest cost of a kidney transplant in the first year was R$ 40,743.03 when cyclosporine was used and the highest was R$ 48,388.17 with the use of tacrolimus. In the second year post-transplant, hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis have a higher cost compared to kidney transplant. Transplantation with deceased donor, treated with tacrolimus: R$ 67,023.39; Hemodialysis R$ 71,717.51 and automated peritoneal dialysis automatic R$ 69,527.03. Conclusions: After the first two years of renal replacement therapy, transplantation demonstrates lower costs to the system when compared to other modalities evaluated. Based on that, this therapy justifies improvements in government policies in this sector.

Resumo Introdução: A doença renal crônica (DRC) é um grande problema de saúde, determina redução na expectativa de vida e aumento dos riscos de doenças cardiovasculares. Método: Estudo observacional, de coorte, retrospectivo, baseado em dados de prontuários de pacientes com DRC em hemodiálise, diálise peritoneal e transplante renal na cidade de Curitiba, no período de janeiro a junho de 2014, avaliando o impacto financeiro no Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS) e na saúde suplementar. Resultados: O menor custo de um transplante renal no primeiro ano foi de R$ 40.743,03, quando utilizada a ciclosporina, e o maior de R$ 48.388,17, com a utilização do tacrolimo. Já no segundo ano pós-transplante, a hemodiálise e a diálise peritoneal têm valor superior ao transplante renal. Transplante com doador falecido, com tacrolimo: R$ 67.023,39; hemodiálise R$ 71.717,51 e diálise peritoneal automática R$ 69.527,03. Conclusões: Após os dois primeiros anos da terapia renal substitutiva, o transplante demonstra menores custos ao sistema, quando comparado às outras modalidades avaliadas. Baseado nisso, esta terapia justifica melhorias nas políticas governamentais nesse setor.

Uma comparação dos custos do transplante renal em relação às diálises no Brasil / Cost comparison of kidney transplant versus dialysis in Brazil / Una comparación de los costes del trasplante renal en relación con las diálisis en Brasil

Resumo: O objetivo do presente estudo foi comparar os custos médicos diretos do transplante renal e das terapias renais substitutivas, especificamente a hemodiálise e a diálise peritoneal, sob a perspectiva do Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS). Os custos das terapias renais substitutivas foram extraídos de informações publicadas na literatura. Os itens de custo previstos do transplante renal foram identificados em um hospital privado mediante coleta dos códigos dos procedimentos utilizados para a cobrança do SUS e os demais itens extraídos da literatura. O resultado desta pesquisa indica que, no período dos quatro anos coberto por este estudo, o transplante renal de doador falecido gera uma economia, por paciente, de R$ 37 mil e R$ 74 mil em relação à hemodiálise e à diálise peritoneal, respectivamente. Quanto ao transplante renal de doador vivo, as economias são ainda maiores: R$ 46 mil e R$ 82 mil em relação à hemodiálise e à diálise peritoneal, respectivamente. Este resultado, aliado a análises de sobrevida e qualidade de vida, pode caracterizar o transplante renal como a melhor alternativa do ponto de vista financeiro e clínico, auxiliando na formulação de políticas públicas relacionadas com os transplantes de órgãos no Brasil.

Abstract: This study aimed to compare the direct medical costs of renal transplantation and renal replacement therapies, specifically hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis, from the perspective of the Brazilian Unified National Health System (SUS). Renal replacement therapies costs were based on data published in the literature. Cost items for kidney transplant were identified in a private hospital based on procedure codes used for charging the SUS, and other items were taken from the literature. In the four years covered by the study, cadaver kidney transplant generated per-patient savings of BRL 37,000 and BRL 74,000 compared to hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis, respectively. Savings were even greater with living donor kidney transplant: BRL 46,000 and BRL 82,000 compared to hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis, respectively. This result, together with survival and quality-of-life analyses, characterizes kidney transplant as the best clinical and financial alternative, thus supporting public policies for organ transplants in Brazil.

Resumen: El objetivo del presente estudio fue comparar los costes médicos directos del trasplante renal y de las terapias renales substitutivas, específicamente la hemodiálisis y la diálisis peritoneal, bajo la perspectiva del Sistema Único de Salud (SUS). Los costes de las terapias renales substitutivas se extrajeron de información publicada en la literatura. Los ítems de coste previstos del trasplante renal se identificaron en un hospital privado, a partir de la recogida de códigos de procedimientos utilizados para el cobro del SUS y los demás ítems extraídos de la literatura. El resultado de esta investigación indica que, en el período de los 4 años cubierto por este estudio, el trasplante renal del donante fallecido genera un ahorro, por paciente, de R$ 37 mil y R$ 74 mil en relación al hemodiálisis y al diálisis peritoneal, respectivamente. En cuanto al trasplante renal del donante vivo, los ahorros son incluso mayores: R$ 46 mil y R$ 82 mil, en relación a la hemodiálisis y a la diálisis peritoneal, respectivamente. Este resultado, junto con análisis de supervivencia y calidad de vida, puede caracterizar el trasplante renal como la mejor alternativa desde el punto de vista financiero y clínico, auxiliando en la formulación de políticas públicas relacionadas con los trasplantes de órganos en Brasil.

Panorama do tratamento hemodialítico financiado pelo Sistema Único de Saúde - Uma perspectiva econômica / Overview of hemodialysis treatment funded by the Brazilian Unified Health System - An economic perspective

ResumoIntrodução:A doença renal crônica (DRC) é um problema de saúde pública e, no Brasil, ainda são identificadas carências de dados sobre características de um dos principais tratamentos, a hemodiálise.Objetivo:Determinar, por meio da descrição do consumo de recursos para o tratamento e suas complicações, o custo associado à hemodiálise e às terapias medicamentosas suplementares em pacientes financiados pelo SUS.Métodos:Métodos de análise observacional transversal e coorte prospectiva foram utilizados considerando dados públicos, dos quais foram coletadas informações referentes a procedimentos hospitalares e ambulatoriais, além de características dos pacientes. Os custos foram calculados a partir dos recursos descritos. Na análise transversal foram considerados indivíduos que realizaram hemodiálise entre janeiro de 2008 e novembro de 2012 e na coorte prospectiva, iniciada em 2009. Análises descritivas foram conduzidas.Resultados:Um total de 91.475 e 118.847 procedimentos de hemodiálise foram realizados em 2008 e 2012, respectivamente, e, para o ano 2017, foi estimado um aumento de 24,8%. A análise por unidade federativa mostrou que São Paulo, Minas Gerais e Rio de Janeiro representam quase metade dos procedimentos, com média de custo, por paciente, de US$ 7.932,52 em 2008, e de US$ 9.112,75 em 2011. Na coorte, composta por 96.600 indivíduos, o medicamento mais utilizado foi a alfapoetina, além de 8% da amostra utilizar calcitriol 1,0 mcg. Foi observada a ocorrência de complicações em 28,2% dos pacientes.Conclusão:Após análise dos dados, diferentes aspectos da utilização da hemodiálise foram demonstrados, sendo observado um aumento na quantidade de procedimentos e, também, nos gastos decorrentes do procedimento.

AbstractIntroduction:End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is a public health problem and, in Brazil, lacks of data on one of the main treatments, hemodialysis, are still identified.Objective:To determine, through description of resources used in ESRD treatment and its complications, the cost associated to hemodialysis and supplementary medical therapy in patients attended by Brazilian Public Health (SUS).Methods:Methods of cross-sectional and prospective cohort observational analysis were conducted using public data, where information about inpatient and outpatient resource use and patients' characteristics were collected. From described resource use, costs were calculated. In cross-sectional analysis subjects who underwent hemodialysis between January/2008 and November/2012 were considered and in prospective cohort, started in 2009. Descriptive analyses were performed.Results:91,475 and 118,847 hemodialysis procedures were performed in 2008 and 2012, respectively, and 24.8% of increase was estimated until 2017. Analysis by federation unit showed that São Paulo, Minas Gerais and Rio de Janeiro states represented almost half of the procedures observed, with mean cost per patient of US$ 7,932.52 in 2008 and US$ 9,112.75 in 2011. In the cohort, composed by 96,600 subjects, the most used drug was alfaepoetin and 8% of the sample used calcitriol 1.0 mcg. The occurrence of complications was observed in 28.2% of patients.Conclusion:After data analysis, different aspects of hemodialysis use were demonstrated, with an increase in amount of procedures and, also, in disease related expenses.

Viviendo con hemodiálisis y sin seguridad social: las voces de los enfermos renales y sus familias / Living in hemodialysis without social insurance: The voices of renal sick people and their families

Objetivo. Examinar las perspectivas y las prácticas de enfermos renales y de sus familias sin seguridad social en relación con los problemas que enfrentan en el tratamiento de hemodiálisis. Material y métodos. Se realizó un estudio cualitativo en Guadalajara, México. En éste participaron 37 enfermos renales en hemodiálisis afiliados al Seguro Popular y 50 familiares. Se obtuvo la información mediante entrevistas individuales y grupales, a partir de análisis de contenido dirigido. Resultados. Los enfermos renales y sus familias enfrentan múltiples dificultades en el tratamiento de hemodiálisis. Las de tipo económico son prioritarias por los costos de la terapia y la carencia de recursos, y por el hecho de que el Seguro Popular excluye la cobertura de la enfermedad renal. Las personas enfrentan tales dificultades combinando acciones en un proceso circular de búsqueda de ayuda. Conclusión. El tratamiento de hemodiálisis representa una carga financiera insostenible para los enfermos renales sin seguridad social y sus familias. Urge implementar un sistema de acceso universal a las terapias renales.

Objective. To examine the perspectives and practices of renal sick people and their families without social insurance regarding problems faced while on dialysis treatment. Materials and methods. A qualitative research was developed in Guadalajara, Mexico. Thirty-seven renal sick people on hemodialysis and 50 relatives participated; all affiliated to Seguro Popular. Information was gathered through individual and group interviews. Directed content analysis was carried out. Results. Renal sick people and their families face multiple difficulties while on hemodialysis treatment; nevertheless, economic ones are perceived as a priority due to treatment expenses, lack of financial resources and non-coverage of kidney disease by Seguro Popular. Multiple actions are combined in a circular searching for help process to face the economic burden. Conclusion. Hemodialysis treatment is an unbearable economic burden for renal sick people and their families without social insurance. Universal access to renal therapies should be implemented urgently.

Cyclosporine versus tacrolimus: cost-effectiveness analysis for renal transplantation in Brazil / Análise de custo-efetividade: ciclosporina versus tacrolimo para transplante renal no Brasil

OBJECTIVE To analyze the cost-effectiveness of treatment regimens with cyclosporine or tacrolimus, five years after renal transplantation. METHODS This cost-effectiveness analysis was based on historical cohort data obtained between 2000 and 2004 and involved 2,022 patients treated with cyclosporine or tacrolimus, matched 1:1 for gender, age, and type and year of transplantation. Graft survival and the direct costs of medical care obtained from the National Health System (SUS) databases were used as outcome results. RESULTS Most of the patients were women, with a mean age of 36.6 years. The most frequent diagnosis of chronic renal failure was glomerulonephritis/nephritis (27.7%). In five years, the tacrolimus group had an average life expectancy gain of 3.96 years at an annual cost of R$78,360.57 compared with the cyclosporine group with a gain of 4.05 years and an annual cost of R$61,350.44. CONCLUSIONS After matching, the study indicated better survival of patients treated with regimens using tacrolimus. However, regimens containing cyclosporine were more cost-effective. .

OBJETIVO Analisar custo-efetividade de regimes terapêuticos com ciclosporina ou tacrolimo cinco anos após transplante renal. MÉTODOS Análise de custo-efetividade com base em dados de coorte histórica 2000-2004, com 2.022 pacientes tratados com ciclosporina ou tacrolimo e pareados 1:1 segundo sexo, idade, tipo e ano de transplante. A sobrevida do enxerto e os custos diretos de cuidados médicos a partir das bases de dados do Sistema Único de Saúde foram utilizados como medida de resultado. RESULTADOS A maioria dos pacientes era do sexo feminino e média de idade de 36,6 anos. O diagnóstico mais frequente de insuficiência renal crônica foi a glomerulonefrite/nefrite (27,7%). Em cinco anos, o grupo tacrolimo obteve uma expectativa de vida média de 3,96 anos de vida ganhos ao custo anual de R$78.360,57 ante 4,05 anos de vida ganhos e de R$61.350,44 para ciclosporina. CONCLUSÕES Após o pareamento, o estudo não mostrou melhor sobrevida dos pacientes com regimes que usam tacrolimo. Além disso, regimes contendo ciclosporina foram mais custo-efetivos. .

Costo-utilidad del trasplante renal frente a la hemodiálisis en el tratamiento de la insuficiencia renal crónica terminal en un hospital peruano / Cost utility of renal transplant vs. hemodialysis in the treatment of end stage chronic kidney failure in a peruvian hospital

Objetivos. Determinar y comparar las razones de costo-utilidad de los trasplantes renales con donante cadavérico (TRDC) practicados en el Hospital Nacional Guillermo Almenara Irigoyen los años 2000-2001, frente a hemodiálisis (HD), cinco años después del inicio del tratamiento. Material y métodos. Se realizó un estudio de costo utilidad, estudiando a todos los pacientes continuadores cinco años post TRDC, a quienes se asignó como controles, dos pacientes con cinco años de HD pareados por edad, sexo y tiempo de enfermedad. Se evaluaron los costos de cada procedimiento, los años de vida ajustados a la calidad (AVAC) utilizando el cuestionario SF-36v2TM y se calcularon las razones de costo utilidad (CU) y costo utilidad incremental (CUI). Resultados. Se realizaron 58 TRDC los años 2000-2001. Cinco años después, 17 (29 por ciento) pacientes fallecieron y 27 (47 por ciento) continuaron con su tratamiento post-TRDC. Treinta y uno (53 por ciento) TRDC fracasaron; 26 por ciento por rechazo al trasplante, 55 por ciento por complicación y 19 por ciento por tratamiento irregular. Los puntajes SF-36v2TM promedio obtenidos por los TRDC y HD fueron 95±13 y 87±18 puntos respectivamente. En ambos años, los AVAC obtenidos por los TRDC y HD fueron de 251 y 229 puntos respectivamente; las razones de CU para los TRDC y los HD fueron de USD 11 984 y USD 9243, y la razón de CUI fue de USD 40 669. Conclusiones. Los TRDC realizados los años 2000-2001, cinco años después resultaron menos costo útiles que las HD; y los TRDC realizados el 2000 tuvieron una menor razón de costo utilidad incremental que los efectuados el 2001, probablemente por su mayor razón de tratamientos irregulares.

Objectives. To assess and compare the cost utility of the cadaveric donor renal transplant (CDRT) at the Hospital Nacional Guillermo Almenara Irigoyen between 2000 to 2001, against haemodialysis (HD), 5 years after treatment initiation. Materials and Methods. A cost utility study design was used, which evaluated every patient continuing treatment after 5 years of having the CDRT done, and 2 controls consisting in patients having received HD for 5 years, matched by age, sex and disease duration. The costs of each procedure and their Quality-adjusted life years (QALY´s) were evaluated using the questionnaire of quality of life SF-36v2TM, finally calculating the cost utility (CU) and incremental cost utility (ICU) ratios. Results. Fifty-eight CDRT were performed between 2000-1. Five years later, 17 (29 percent) patients died and only 27 (47 percent) continued the treatment after CDRT. Out of the 31 patients (53 percent) having treatment failures, 26 percent rejected the transplant, 55 percent presented a complication and 19 percent were irregular. The mean SF-36v2TM scores obtained by the CDRT and HD patients were 95±12 and 87±18 points, respectively. The QALYs obtained by the CDRT and HD groups were 251 and 229 points, respectively; the CU ratios for the CDRT and HD were USD 11,984 and USD 9,243; and the ICU ratio for the period was USD 40,669. Conclusions. CDRTs performed during the years 2000-1 at the HNGAI, were 5 years later surprisingly less cost effective than the HD and CDRT´s performed at year 2000 had a lower incremental cost utility ratio that those performed the 2001, probably because of the highest rate of irregular treatment.

Cálculo del impacto económico para Chile del uso de losartán en diabéticos tipo 2 con nefropatía diabética, basado en resultados del estudio RENAAL / Economic impact of Losartan use in type 2 diabetic patients with nephropathy

Background: The study RENAAL (Reduction of Endpoints in NIDDM with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan) demonstrated that Losartan was more effective lo reduce the progression of kidney disease in diabetic patients with proteinuria and a reduction in glomerular filtration rate. Aim: To perform a cost benefit analysis of Losartan use from provider and payer points of view. Material and methods: Published data of the RENAAL study was analyzed. The costs of the use or not use of Losartan in patients with diabetic nephropathy were compared in terms of total costs of the disease including medications, hospital admissions for myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accidents and congestive cardiac failure and the costs of chronic hemodialysis. Results: The reduction in antihypertensive medication use, hospital admissions, and the delay in dialysis requirement from a mean of 65 to 79 months induced by Losartan use, results in net savings of $7,576,135 per patient, at 3.5 years of intervention. The figure does not change using different sensitivity scenarios. Conclusions: The eventual use of Losartan in type 2 diabetic patients results in important savings.

Análise de custo-efetividade em relação às terapias renais substitutivas: como pensar estudos em relação a essas intervenções no Brasil? / Cost-effectiveness analysis of renal replacement therapies: how should we design research on these interventions in Brazil?

Este estudo tem por finalidade contribuir com a discussão sobre as possibilidades para a execução de avaliação econômica em saúde, em especial por meio da técnica de custo-efetividade, em relação às terapias renais substitutivas em portadores de falência renal crônica à luz do nosso contexto. Para tanto se realizou uma revisão bibliográfica sobre as intervenções e seus cursos alternativos na perspectiva das proposições metodológicas dispostas na literatura, considerando a disponibilidade de dados e informações no nosso meio que subsidiam este tipo de pesquisa.

This study aims to contribute to the discussion on the possibility of applying health economics assessment, specifically the cost-effectiveness technique, to renal replacement therapies for end-stage renal failure. A review was conducted on the interventions and their alternative courses from the perspective of the various methodological proposals in the literature, considering the availability of data and information in Brazil to back this type of research.

Epidemiology and cost of haemodialysis in Jordan

To assess the epidemiology and burden of haemodialysis in Jordan, all patients on haemodialysis [1711 patients] were surveyed during September/October 2003. Mean age was 48.9 years, 56% were male, 86.8% were unemployed and 92% were poor. Mean distance to the haemodialysis service was 13.6 km. Annual hepatitis B and C seroconversion for patients negative before dialysis was 0.34% and 2.6% respectively. Prevalence of haemodialysis was 312 per million population; the incidence in 2002 was 111 per million population. Fatality rate at 1 year was 20%. Diabetes mellitus was the leading cause of haemodialysis, 29.2% of cases. Total estimated cost of haemodialysis in 2003 was US$ 29.7 million

The impact of losartan on the lifetime incidence of ESRD and costs in Mexico / El impacto del losartan en la incidencia de por vida de la enfermedad renal de la etapa terminal y sus costos en México

Background. The RENAAL (Reduction of Endpoints in Type 2 Diabetes with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan) study demonstrated that treatment with losartan reduced the risk of ESRD by 29% among hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes and diabetic nephropathy. The objective of this study was to project the effect of losartan compared to placebo on the lifetime incidence of ESRD and associated costs from a third-party payer perspective in Mexico. Methods. A competing risks method was used to estimate lifetime incidence of ESRD, while accounting for the risk of death without ESRD. The cost associated with ESRD was estimated by combining the cumulative incidence of ESRD with the lifetime cost associated with ESRD. Total cost was estimated as the sum of the cost associated with ESRD from the three main public institutions in Mexico, the lifetime cost of losartan therapy, and other costs (non-ESRD/non-losartan) expected for patients with type 2 diabetes. Survival was estimated by weighting the life expectancies with and without ESRD by the cumulative risk of ESRD. Results. The projected lifetime incidence of ESRD for losartan patients was lower (66%) compared with placebo patients (83%). This reduction in ESRD resulted in a decrease in ESRD-related cost of M$49,737 per patient and a discounted gain of 0.697 life years per patient. After accounting for the cost of losartan and the additional cost associated with greater survival, we projected that treatment with losartan would result in a net savings of M$24,073 per patient. Conclusion. Treatment with losartan in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy not only reduced the within-trial incidence of ESRD but is projected to result in lifetime reductions in ESRD, increased survival, and overall cost savings to public institutions in Mexico.

Antecedentes. El estudio RENAAL (Reducción de los grados o puntos terminales en la diabetes tipo 2 con losartan, el antagonista de la anglotenslna II) demostró que el tratamiento con losartan redujo el riesgo de la ESRD (enfermedad renal de la etapa terminal) en 29% entre pacientes hipertensos con diabetes tipo 2 y neuropatía diabética. El propósito estudiado fue hacer una proyección del efecto del losartan comparándolo con el placebo en la incidencia de por vida de la ESRD y con los costos asociados de un tercer pagador en perspectiva en México. Métodos. Se utilizó un método de riesgos muy competitivo para calcular la incidencia de por vida de la ESRD, al mismo tiempo que se calculaba el riesgo de muerte sin la ESRD. El costo asociado con la ESRD se calculó confirmando la incidencia acumulativa de la ESRD en relación con el costo de por vida de la terapia con losar-tan y otros costos (sin ESRD o sin losartan) con los que se contaba para pacientes con diabetes tipo 2. La supervivencia se calculó esperando las expectativas de vida con y sin ESRD por el riesgo acumulativo de ESRD. Resultados. La proyectada incidencia de por vida de la ESRD en cuanto a los pacientes con losartan fue más baja (66%) comparada con los pacientes que tomaron placebo (83%). Esta reducción de la ESRD tuvo por resultado una disminución en el costo relacionado con la ESRD de $49,737 por paciente y una ganancia descartada de 0.697 años de vida por paciente. Luego de contabilizar el costo del losartan y el costo añadido asociado con una mayor supervivencia, llegamos a la conclusión de que el tratamiento con losartan daría por resultado un ahorro neto de $24,073 por paciente. Conclusión. El tratamiento mediante losartan en pacientes aquejados de diabetes tipo 2 y neuropatía no sólo redujo la incidencia intraexperimental de la ESRD, sino que además nos ha servido para proyectar que resulte en reducciones de por vida en la ESRD, en una supervivencia incrementada y en un ahorro total de costos en cuanto a las instituciones públicas en nuestro país.

Chronic renal failure in Thai children: etiology, cost, and outcome.

We studied the epidemiology, cost and outcome of chronic renal failure (CRF) in Thai children by sending questionnaires to all university hospitals, all government general service hospitals and all pediatric nephrologists in the country. A total of 238 cases (107 from 8 university hospitals and 131 from 70 government general service hospitals) were diagnosed from 1996 to 1998. Mean age of the patients was 8.3 +/- 4.9 yr, male to female ratio was 1.4:1. Congenital KUB anomalies (obstructive uropathy and hypo/dysplasia) were the main causes of CRF in these patients, especially in the under five age group. Only a small number of patients received renal replacement therapy (chronic dialysis and kidney transplant) and the mortality rate was 18.7 per cent in university hospitals. Renal transplantation was performed in only 5 patients in 2 pediatric units and another 2 patients in adult renal units. The outcome of renal transplantation in this small group of patients was very satisfactory. The cost of CRF treatment in children was comparable to adults. The main problems in the management of CRF in Thai children included the lack of experienced personnel, lack of equipment and funding. We conclude that in order to improve the care of CRF in Thai children, a training program for health personnel and budget allocation should be established.